Post by xyz3400 on Feb 20, 2024 1:45:54 GMT -5
Ronaldo de Assis Moreira, known as Ronaldinho Gaúcho, became a defendant in a collective civil action seeking R$300 million in refunds and moral damages. Bruno Cantini/Disclosure Action asks former player to pay R$300 million Bruno Cantini The process is related to the 18K Ronaldinho group, a company that promised returns of 2% per day in investing in cryptocurrencies. According to the Brazilian Institute for the Study and Defense of Consumer Relations (Ibedec) in Goiás, the company is preventing investors from accessing the amounts invested since the end of last year. The action represents 150 people from different Brazilian states who were harmed by the company. Losses range from US$50 to US$500 thousand.In October, the Public Ministry announced the opening of an investigation against the company, which has evidence of operating a financial pyramid scheme.
In the same month, Ronaldinho announced that he had broken his marketing contract with 18K. Since then, customers have tried to withdraw their investments, but have been unsuccessful.The Ministry of Health warns”: the costs of legal actions are rising, as can be seen, based on analyzes by the Institute of Supplementary Health Studies in , the average monthly expenditure per user Honduras Mobile Number List was R$173, 86. In, it rose to R$281.81. This means an increase of 62.1%, driven by technologies, waste, fraud, an aging population and legal actions. From the moment the Judiciary removes the law from plans and overvalues the issue of the abusiveness of operators' contracts, without further explanations on specific topics, the economy responds to the fact and citizens are the most harmed by this.
For example, the law of plans allows artificial insemination to be excluded from the contract and the ANS states, in its regulations, that not only insemination, but any and all assisted reproduction methods, must have the same fate. Even so, people tend to “put their health plan in court”, because “it is absurd to refuse to pay for medical treatment” and, even though the Superior Court of Justice has supported in all its terms what is stated In law, some courts grant the right to impose coverage for in vitro fertilization treatment requested in court.The clause that stipulates this modality does not comply with the legal provision, which is why it is null and cannot be invoked for the benefit of any of the contracting parties'', he wrote in the ruling. In view of this situation, the judge understood that the lawyer did not act illegally in demanding payment of his fees in cash, as provided for in the contract. Furthermore, she concluded, article 253 of the Civil Code clearly indicates the possibility of satisfying the credit if one of the two types of provision becomes unenforceable.
In the same month, Ronaldinho announced that he had broken his marketing contract with 18K. Since then, customers have tried to withdraw their investments, but have been unsuccessful.The Ministry of Health warns”: the costs of legal actions are rising, as can be seen, based on analyzes by the Institute of Supplementary Health Studies in , the average monthly expenditure per user Honduras Mobile Number List was R$173, 86. In, it rose to R$281.81. This means an increase of 62.1%, driven by technologies, waste, fraud, an aging population and legal actions. From the moment the Judiciary removes the law from plans and overvalues the issue of the abusiveness of operators' contracts, without further explanations on specific topics, the economy responds to the fact and citizens are the most harmed by this.
For example, the law of plans allows artificial insemination to be excluded from the contract and the ANS states, in its regulations, that not only insemination, but any and all assisted reproduction methods, must have the same fate. Even so, people tend to “put their health plan in court”, because “it is absurd to refuse to pay for medical treatment” and, even though the Superior Court of Justice has supported in all its terms what is stated In law, some courts grant the right to impose coverage for in vitro fertilization treatment requested in court.The clause that stipulates this modality does not comply with the legal provision, which is why it is null and cannot be invoked for the benefit of any of the contracting parties'', he wrote in the ruling. In view of this situation, the judge understood that the lawyer did not act illegally in demanding payment of his fees in cash, as provided for in the contract. Furthermore, she concluded, article 253 of the Civil Code clearly indicates the possibility of satisfying the credit if one of the two types of provision becomes unenforceable.